Obsessed? Who ME?

CAUGHT ON DISQUS
[Click this title]

Disqus is a very cool software outfit that handles the "comments" for several of the sites where I put forth my profundities. It stores your comments and you can access them. I'm sure the Big Data types access them all the time.

ANYWAY... I accessed my recent stuff, and surprise! I've been cranking out a lot of stuff about bots and trolls. I grabbed these to show you the depth of my obsession.

 I THINK THIS WHOLE BOT/TROLL THING IS A HUGE STORY. IT IS ONE OF THE BIGGER FACETS OF THE INTERNET-CHANGES-THE-WORLD META-STORY. 

... Oh, sorry I'm trying to control my obsession.


                                                  Bots. They're everywhere!

A Bit of Social Intercourse on Breitbart Between me, Some Bots and Some Non-bots



[ "hidad" said "If the Dims want it so desperately, it must be crushed!"  a typical bot snort. ]


seniorjunior (scooter duff)  hidad  10 hours ago

Now think about that (if you think, i.e. not a bot). I'd bet in five minutes you could think of 10 or 15 things both you and the dems want desperately. We've got to start finding common ground or we are toast as a country.
That's why I have any suspicion that you are a Russian bot. It's their OBJECTIVE to split us and make us despise one another.
Take a read through the comments here. It's frighteningly "tribal." People hiding behind their anonymity get tribal real easy. But it's AWFUL for America. I hope we can cool our jets and have arguments without the spitting, and recognize and ignore the Rooskie bots.


[ this was the post I had labeled a Nastybot. It mentioned "purple kush" ]

seniorjunior (scooter duff)  Verbotene Gedanken  4 days ago

Nasty bot... with weed overtones.

[ some guy wanted to know how I spotted bots ]


seniorjunior (scooter duff)  Verbotene Gedanken  4 days ago

I hope you get my point. Bot exchanges are just like this one, starting with purple kush. No content, just insults and one-ups like 'I live for this..." 

[ why did I think a certain post was from a Russian? ] 

seniorjunior (scooter duff)  hidad  10 hours ago

Oh, for "recognizing Rooskie bots" check out me humble blog post on the subject.

[ this was in response to a "you suck libcrap" response to some of my libcrap ]

seniorjunior (scooter duff)  Tyler Durden  a day ago


[ this short insult called me a "Hegelian"  ]
NASTYBOT with literary overtones. They (Rooskies) are getting "sophisticated."

[ this in response to a classic nastybot ]
CLASSIC nastybot


[ this one too ]


seniorjunior (scooter duff)  iicapnii  a day ago

NASTYBOT


seniorjunior (scooter duff)  a day ago

I spot a BUNCH of "nastybots" below. Here's what a nastybot is...
(then I referred him to my "NASTYBOT" blog post)

[ this was in response to an especially nasty one, with violence in it ]
NASTYBOT ...and a warmongering one at that. Pay no attention to hate talk; it's destructive to America.

[ at this moment, I was hit with a flurry of nasty bots which I chronicled thusly:


seniorjunior (scooter duff)  SuperPsychicSpyChick  2 days ago

NASTYBOT

seniorjunior (scooter duff)  SoundMind  2 days ago
nastybot

seniorjunior (scooter duff)  Infadel Macgee  2 days ago
NASTYBOT

seniorjunior (scooter duff)  Guest  2 days ago
Bot

[ here I'm answering a guy who thought I had called him a bot. Not. ]
seniorjunior (scooter duff)  Spasmo G  3 days ago
Good! Just for the record, it was "Geo Trump" that tripped my bot alarm.
 It was short, very quick, substance free, a topic changer and a heavy insult. I've been studying I've been researching these short bot shots a lot and blabbing about 
what I learn on my blog.

[ a lady asked me why I hadn't answered a bot's nasty question ]
OK, I did NOT kill any babies today. Happier? That was an ad hominem 
insult, the marker of HATEBOTS. Their objective is to turn us against 
one another, degrade national unity and further split America. Who 
are they? Rooskies, Chinese, Iranians and North Koreans, and they 
are ALL OVER Breitbart comments.

Bot, Bot, Bot, NASTYBOT, Bot, Bot........Pow, pow, pow.
Always call them out. They don't respond when they are really bots.

NEVER LET A BOT OR A TROLL GET YOUR GOAT. OR MAKE
YOU MAD.
THAT'S HOW THEY WIN.
















Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teddy and Bernie

Image
By Gosh, I Think I've Got It! Bernie caught some gaff for having a narrow focus campaign. Here's how he's going to broaden it out. IMHO. And that doesn't mean he's running for anything,  just being Bernie. * Teddy as the model for... ...The New Bernie campaign? * I was zapping through the pile of political pitches I get everyday on my old fashioned e-mail (wduffer@aol.com), zap, zap, zap... Congressmen from Colorado, Florida, Ohio... on and on, Democrats I never heard of, but I'm on "The List." I don't get irritated, I just get rid of the ads; I mean after all, they're Democrats. After I finished my zapping, I had a snack and set to recording another audiobook chapter. Then it hit me, based on one of the ads I zapped.  Here 'tis: It was when I dragged it up again that I noticed it was a Bernie ad, and I said, "That's it!" Do you how many great quotes flowed from Teddy R? About half of them ar
Read more

An Informational Present

Image
I TOLD YOU ABOUT THIS SIX YEARS AGO (Surely you remember ?)  ...And in those six years, multiple research projects have affirmed and reaffirmed that SENOLYTICS is a big deal. The science of senolytics: how a new pill could spell the end of ageing                                    * I'm reminded of this by a well-researched article in The Guardian , a newspaper I respect. Aside from that hyperbolic, click-bait-ish headline, it's a fair summary of the state of knowledge on the subject. In brief: Certain drugs and several supplements help the body get rid of senescent cells, "zombie cells" that don't die after they quit doing their thing and just hang around spitting out inflammatory chemicals that damage various organs, joints, and brain cells. The senolytic agents augment apoptosis , nature's way of killing off the senescent cells. When those senescent cells are gone, things start improving measurably (see the mouse with the young look in the Guardian piece.)
Read more

Scooter Duff's Theory of Cosmology [UPDATED 5.4.24]

Image
 [Olde Duff Gets Seriouser] SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES  ARE MOSTLY PRIMORDIAL  DARK MATTER [Draft 8/19/2023] [UPDATED 5.4.24] & [9.25.24] THE BIG NEWS.. ..Is from the James Webb Space Telescope. There were furiously active galaxies very soon after the Big Bang, not that long after the first generation stars happened. This implies supermassive black holes at the centers of the new galaxies.  The question, "how did these giant black holes get there so early?" seems not quite answered by the two main contenders, "Giant dust collapse," and "Many stellar black holes consolidating." Thus I decided to toss this hat into the ring: At the big bang, and dark matter was the first matter of any kind to form (perhaps during the mysterious “inflation” event -- my personal theory).  It’s mutual gravitational attraction and lack of interaction to any electromagnetic force allowed it to exist and start to coalesce, even in the heat of the BB, long before baryonic matter
Read more