Classic NASTYBOT Example

There I was, "participating" in a comments section...
[Click this title]

I was yakking about the cop that shot the NYCity terrorist truck driver, saying "he was a cop."

That triggered a NASTYBOT calling itself "Geo Trump."

Geo Trump - Just Now

Kill any babies today liberal?



Geo Trump’s comment is in reply to seniorjunior (scooter duff):
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Classic NASTYBOT.
   -No substantive content
   -Change of topic to hot button subject
   -Polarizing in its insult ("liberal" made it a blow for the "conservative" tribe)
   -Very fast (it was "typing" within 3 seconds of my "he was a cop" post.
   -Bad punctuation.
   -Text in bold
Here's another, less obvious NASTYBOT candidate (Same "cop" comment from me)
                Cuthbert J Twillie • 3 minutes ago

Try reading the article before spouting off nonsense. If that's too tough for you then find a 5th Grader in a Private School to read it to you.


Cuthbert J Twillie’s comment is in reply to seniorjunior (scooter duff):
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Maybe a NASTYBOT, or Maybe a NASTYBOD (Real human bean**)
   -No substantive content (didn't make sense in context of comment)
   -Generic insult "try reading the article"
   -Simple put down "too tough for you"
   -BUT not as fast (3 minutes); Not polarizing; Good grammar; no bold.
... so maybe it was a person. It's easy to be nasty and takes no real brainpower.


Heads up: Lately some of the bots are becoming more sophisticated. These rarely have bad grammar, and sometimes they pull a phrase out of your comment and feed it back before the insult. They post an arbitrary time period after your post. (The Rooskies, seeing how effective they are, hired some better trolls. IMHO)
CONFESSION: For about five seconds NASTYBOTS really piss me off... that's the N'BOT's objective. It's a reflex response we all need to shrug off. I'm working on it.

Even when it's an actual human bean, forgive them, they are just copying these NASTYBOTS' really bad examples. It's one of the ways the bots are destructive to civil discourse.

*cartoon credit

 **




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teddy and Bernie

Image
By Gosh, I Think I've Got It! Bernie caught some gaff for having a narrow focus campaign. Here's how he's going to broaden it out. IMHO. And that doesn't mean he's running for anything,  just being Bernie. * Teddy as the model for... ...The New Bernie campaign? * I was zapping through the pile of political pitches I get everyday on my old fashioned e-mail (wduffer@aol.com), zap, zap, zap... Congressmen from Colorado, Florida, Ohio... on and on, Democrats I never heard of, but I'm on "The List." I don't get irritated, I just get rid of the ads; I mean after all, they're Democrats. After I finished my zapping, I had a snack and set to recording another audiobook chapter. Then it hit me, based on one of the ads I zapped.  Here 'tis: It was when I dragged it up again that I noticed it was a Bernie ad, and I said, "That's it!" Do you how many great quotes flowed from Teddy R? About half of them ar
Read more

An Informational Present

Image
I TOLD YOU ABOUT THIS SIX YEARS AGO (Surely you remember ?)  ...And in those six years, multiple research projects have affirmed and reaffirmed that SENOLYTICS is a big deal. The science of senolytics: how a new pill could spell the end of ageing                                    * I'm reminded of this by a well-researched article in The Guardian , a newspaper I respect. Aside from that hyperbolic, click-bait-ish headline, it's a fair summary of the state of knowledge on the subject. In brief: Certain drugs and several supplements help the body get rid of senescent cells, "zombie cells" that don't die after they quit doing their thing and just hang around spitting out inflammatory chemicals that damage various organs, joints, and brain cells. The senolytic agents augment apoptosis , nature's way of killing off the senescent cells. When those senescent cells are gone, things start improving measurably (see the mouse with the young look in the Guardian piece.)
Read more

Scooter Duff's Theory of Cosmology [UPDATED 5.4.24]

Image
 [Olde Duff Gets Seriouser] SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES  ARE MOSTLY PRIMORDIAL  DARK MATTER [Draft 8/19/2023] [UPDATED 5.4.24] & [9.25.24] THE BIG NEWS.. ..Is from the James Webb Space Telescope. There were furiously active galaxies very soon after the Big Bang, not that long after the first generation stars happened. This implies supermassive black holes at the centers of the new galaxies.  The question, "how did these giant black holes get there so early?" seems not quite answered by the two main contenders, "Giant dust collapse," and "Many stellar black holes consolidating." Thus I decided to toss this hat into the ring: At the big bang, and dark matter was the first matter of any kind to form (perhaps during the mysterious “inflation” event -- my personal theory).  It’s mutual gravitational attraction and lack of interaction to any electromagnetic force allowed it to exist and start to coalesce, even in the heat of the BB, long before baryonic matter
Read more